top of page

Digital ID: Promise and Peril


A female portrait close-up with a matrix-like numbers on the lens

Identity verification is the cornerstone of trust in any transaction or interaction, whether for national security, commercial activities, or access to services. As such, digital identity solutions offer immense potential benefits for sectors like investing apps, neobanks, peer-to-peer lending platforms, and other fintech companies facilitating virtual transactions which rely on establishing trusted relationships at a distance. Some of the businesses that stand to gain the most from user-friendly and reliable electronic identity systems include robo-advisors, banks, retail banking, car title financing, payday lending, crowdfunding, marketplace lending, invoice factoring platforms, and supply chain financing, among many others.


Traditional paper-based and in-person identification procedures are rapidly shifting to digital platforms that promise more security, inclusion, and convenience through instant online identity confirmation. As the presented data illustrates, this digital identity revolution is gathering momentum globally, attracting major investments from corporations and governments alike. However, critics warn its risks may outweigh the touted benefits. A nuanced examination of the latest trends highlights both the transformative potential of digital identity systems along with areas requiring caution to prevent unchecked expansion of surveillance and exclusion.


Digital identity adoption is accelerating worldwide, signalling a new phase in identity norms. OneID, a UK startup offering bank-verified digital IDs, recently secured £1m in funding to expand nationwide following the model’s success in Europe. The enthusiastic investment response, including from private equity giant ACF Investors, underscores confidence that streamlined digital credentials could soon become the norm for millions across the UK and Europe. The approach aligns with the EU’s proposed digital identity framework to facilitate cross-border verification. Government advocacy has proven crucial: former UK heads of state Tony Blair and William Hague actively promoted digital identity systems to modernize public and private services. Their policy endorsement mirrors the EU’s regulatory push, emphasizing how concerted public-private support can rapidly legitimize digital identity.


Mainstream financial institutions are also driving adoption: Lloyds Bank invested £10m in digital ID firm Yoti, while payments unicorn Checkout.com launched an AI identity product for clients. As digital identity diffuses across borders and sectors, advanced technologies like biometrics and artificial intelligence are being integrated by providers like Bureau to offer nuanced identity insights for securing transactions. Bureau’s $4.5m capital infusion will further develop its AI network analysing everything from documents to behavioral patterns when evaluating identity and risk. Such technological sophistication can significantly enhance trust and convenience: imagine identity verification for banking, jobs, travel or healthcare via a single ‘digital passport’ on your smartphone instead of filling countless forms.


However, critics argue such convenience may come at the cost of privacy and liberty. Centralised digital identity databases present honeypots for hackers, as evidenced by recent breaches exposing millions of people’s personal records. Outsourcing identity verification to private platforms also grants them tremendous power over people’s lives, with limited oversight. Moreover, allowing AI to automatically determine identity and risk based on analyse individuals’ digital footprints opens the door to machine bias and unfair exclusions. While technology like Bureau’s promises more advanced identity confirmation, opaqueness around its judgements undermines notions of due process.


In response, decentralized digital identity models are emerging to empower individuals with more control over their data. Finland and Germany’s partnership on ‘self-sovereign’ digital identity aims to develop blockchain-based credentials letting users selectively disclose information securely without relying on external databases. Such user-centric systems align with democratic principles around consent and freedom. However, transitioning from current centralised frameworks would require overcoming inertia as institutions resist relinquishing control over identity processes.


Questions around inclusion also arise regarding whether digital identity could impose a new divide between those with digital access and literacy and marginalized groups lacking both. Instituting digital credentials as the norm across services and transactions could penalize the approximately four million UK adults estimated to be without basic digital skills. Bureau plans to expand its platform to over 100 countries, but many developing nations lack fundamental digital infrastructure. Fraught legacies around imposition of state ID systems also necessitate careful thinking before digitizing identity. Could campaigns for universal ID cards or digital registers be used to monitor minorities and immigrants? Strong regulatory checks are vital given the inherently intimate nature of identity data.


In conclusion, the emerging digital identity ecosystem shows immense promise to facilitate trusted interactions and expand access. Corporate investment, government advocacy, and grassroots adoption appear to be achieving the tipping point for mainstream integration of technologies connecting our physical and digital identities. However, centralised and opaque systems usher legitimate fears around privacy, inclusion, discrimination, and state surveillance.


Hybrid approaches combining digital credentials with protections around consent and decentralisation can potentally resolve these tensions. Our identities and rights in a digitally-mediated world require both technological innovation and ethical foundations. If developed thoughtfully, digital identity solutions can overcome historic barriers to financial services, mobility and social welfare. But we must remain vigilant that digitization does not lead to a proliferation of ‘digital doubles’ defined speculatively by algorithms and data brokers without opportunities for redress. The road ahead necessitates continuous debate regarding how to harness digital identity for empowerment rather than control. With diligent oversight and inclusive implementation, decentralised and ethical digital identity systems can undergird trust vital for society’s functioning.


 

With over a decade of hands-on expertise in strategic compliance guidance, iBerotech leverages its extensive network and partnerships to empower foreign firms in skilfully navigating Spain's intricate regulatory environment for competitive advantage.



bottom of page